在 2026-2-18 03:09, Jacek Caban 写道:
Sorry, I meant to question the rest of the series, which adds a number of wrappers. What is wrong with leaving 32-bit time in 64-bit builds unsupported on XP? Why do we need this? What makes it worth increasing binary size for everyone who uses 32-bit time?I think it's better to import these functions on x86 as well, as we currently do. However, if we really need to support those wrappers, then yes, we can assume they are available on arm64ec and import them directly instead.
This makes sense. Not only is 64-bit `time_t` default on 64-bit targets, it cannot be changed to 32-bit by defining `_USE_32BIT_TIME_T`.
The question is probably, why would anyone call 32-bit time functions on 64-bit systems? why they don't do casts instead?
-- Best regards, LIU Hao
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
