On Fri, 2 May 2025, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
__C89_NAMELESS or DUMMYSTRUCTNAME ?
Right, we seem to be using these a bit inconsistently across winnt.h so far. I guess I can add __C89_NAMELESS here too, to make it as well decorated as possible, but if that's really needed, we have a lot of cases where it's missing anyway.
// Martin _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
