Given that nodes would not propagate future-dated blocks, what's a scenario where gaming timestamps would be plausible?
On Nov 23, 2017 7:05 AM, "John Tromp" <john.tr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wouldn't this create an incentive for a miner to include all transactions > with fees attached from the mempool and publish the block with a time stamp > enough in the future to allow that size of block? Yes, it clearly provides incentives to lie about timestamps, which I think is enough to make it a bad idea. regards, -John
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
