Oh, didn't know. Thank you very much John. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:05 PM, John Tromp <john.tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Alberto Garcia <agarciaill...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > That means that to account and prove ownership > > of your money you should keep a set of private keys. Am I correct? If I > am, > > is there a way to simplify the user the "trouble" of having so many keys? > > Yes, your wallet will normally store your private keys, which should > all be derivable from a master seed as in HD wallets. > > > - Second one is related with privacy. Since one of the main pillars of > the > > MimbleWimble concept is that users not involved in a transaction will not > > know what is the amount transacted I find confusing the "Putting it > > together" point > > (https://github.com/ignopeverell/grin/blob/master/ > doc/intro.md#putting-it-all-together). > > I say so since it affirms that a transaction includes the fee in clear. > If > > the fee value is (as it should be) in a directly proportional > relationship > > with the transacted amount > > No, the fee should be unrelated to the private transaction amount. > Just as in bitcoin, it should depend on resource usage (number of > inputs and number of outputs), and confirmation urgency. > > regards, > -John > -- Alberto García Illera GPG Public Key: https://goo.gl/twKUUv
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
