May be unrealistic or not in 10 years time (which was in the context).
 
My point was not the numbers, but that we can have 0% or even negative dilution at a target througput we aim for using minimum burned minimum fee and constant block reward.
 
Garrick Ollivander
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2017 at 3:37 PM
From: "John Tromp" <[email protected]>
To: "Garrick Ollivander" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Seamus Finnigan" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Mimblewimble] On block rewards
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Garrick Ollivander
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Let's assume we want 0% dilution after grin reaches Visa like 2000 tx/s use
> use with a block time of 10 seconds,

That's completely unrealistic. Bandwidth wise, grin scales worse than bitcoin,
with transactions taking well over 2KB, mostly due to rangeproofs.
Your block full of 20K tx would take a monstrous 400MB, and a grin full node
would have need a bandwidth of over 3456 GB / day.
Even a minimal client keeping only the 32 byte transaction kernels
(which can't be pruned) would need storage space of 2TB per year.

regards,
-John
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to