I'm not sure what you mean by "at a lower height"...there isn't really any way to revoke transactions, in the sense that you want, that I'm aware of.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:21:25PM +0100, Quirinus Quirrell wrote: > I was looking at payment channels in mimblewimble and I wasnt clear if they > could be bi-directional, by revoking transactions. The whitepaper talks > about increase value v. > > I think a transaction in a channel could just be revoked by B signing a new > return transaction, but at a lower height than the transaction being > revoked. New transactions that A signs would be at a decreasing height. > > Publishing spends would have to be timed carefully, and the size of the > channel would gradually shorten, but they have to close anyway... > > Q > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Andrew Poelstra Mathematics Department, Blockstream Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew "A goose alone, I suppose, can know the loneliness of geese who can never find their peace, whether north or south or west or east" --Joanna Newsom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
