Yep that would be the correct setup in this instance.  

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition" 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services 
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net 
Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org <mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> On 
Behalf Of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 12:56 PM
To: Mikrotik Users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability

Thanks all, I will look at doing this with OSPF.

On 12/21/2018 11:43 AM, Robert Nickerson wrote:
> We use OSPF for a setup of this type. It seems to work well.
>
> Thx
>
> RAN
>
> On 12/20/2018 3:43 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm looking at a configuration to set up bonding between two Mikrotik 
>> routers (CCR1009 and RB2011), using two separate wireless links 
>> between them (external radios).
>>
>> I am concerned about one of the links having an issue where it stays 
>> linked, but stops passing traffic.
>>
>> Which bonding driver would be best suited to providing maximum 
>> availability? Bonded capacity is not required, but the links aren't 
>> the same speed; so I'd want to prefer the faster link if 
>> non-aggregated capacity is required.
>>
>> It seems like any method which only supports MII monitoring is out, 
>> because the MII link wouldn't drop (it's Ethernet to the radio); 
>> which rules out 802.11ad, active-backup, and balance-tlb.
>>
>> broadcast seems like it would be limited to the slower link, rather 
>> than the faster link.
>>
>> balance-rr states that it requires equal bandwidth links.
>>
>> This appears to only leave balance-xor and balance-alb. It seems like 
>> balance-alb is most likely the best choice.
>>
>> I am also unclear on how the ARP availability mechanism judges a port 
>> to be available. I think that I would want to assign a unique probing 
>> address to each port on each end of each router, and have those IP 
>> addresses (one per port) set in the arp-ip-targets list? This should 
>> allow the router to know which specific ports work, and which don't?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>

--
-----------------------------------------------
-  Nick Bright                                -
-  Vice President of Technology               -
-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-              -
-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
-  Web http://www.valnet.net/                 -
-----------------------------------------------
- Are your files safe?                        -
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup          -
- More information & 30 day free trial at     -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
-----------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to