If you're running multiple full tables, Mikrotik on x86 will have better performance, typically, than on a CCR. I have run full tables on as small as a CCR1009 with few issues, but prefer x86.
For a few thousand routes, as in an IGP, BGP on CCR is completely fine. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > I remember the CCR had a lot of issues running BGP and would crash. I'm > not worried about it takes a couple of minutes to build routes when it > first boots up. Are the issues resolved at this point? > > I'm running an older x86 box for BGP and want to replace the Powercode BMU > (x86) with a more power efficient unit, possibly a second CCR? Does this > sound like a good idea at this point or will I have Mikrotik problems? Is > there something better than the CCR for these jobs? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > -- Jeremy Austin jhaus...@gmail.com (907) 895-2311 office (907) 803-5422 cell Heritage NetWorks <https://heritagenet.works/> - Whitestone Power & Communications - Vertical Broadband, LLC <http://verticalbroadband.com/>
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
