Anne,
Of course! 100%! But, again, before such analyses are completed to prove
such, it's premature to assume foul play. Click "Recent Comments" on MPOD.
John
> On 02/20/2024 3:08 PM EST Anne Black <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Yes John,
>
> But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan
> desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the
> records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected.
>
> Anne Black
> IMPACTIKA.com
> [email protected]
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via
> Meteorite-list <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello, my best..
>
> Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related
> topics--right?
> Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was
> picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find
> appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without
> foundation.
>
> I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer
> keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why.
>
> As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor.
> Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested,
> (Privately).
>
> Regards, John Lutzon
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
