Agree with JR?
I think you missed a "." :-)
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kurimsky via Meteorite-list
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 6:55 PM
To: John Lutzon
Cc: Meteorite List
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question
.- - -. .-. . . .- - .. - …. .- - - .-. !!!
Paul Kurimsky
Sent from my iPhone
[email protected]
On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find
another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems
to
be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known
location object -- Liberty Bell 7.
So, to ET:
If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out,
somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered
would
it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART
probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the
added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows
up here from out there it Is ET
I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature
superconductor to land in my mailbox ---- mailbox will be for
sale.
JL
.--- .-.. --- ..- -
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
