Hi Kevin, As far as I can make out, talking with other researchers, then it can/will be done but takes extra time and work and thus many just get given the 3 designation rather than do all that work to divide it up even more...although if one is suspected as a 3.00 then I imagine it is worth it or if the presenter of the specimen pays for the time and effort to do the work.
Graham On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:57 AM Kevin Kichinka via Meteorite-list < [email protected]> wrote: > Team Meteorite: > > A couple of years ago it seemed that researchers were no longer going to > sub-divide LL3 mets to classifications like 'LL3.05' or 'LL3.10', or I > suppose the most primitive one of LL3.0'. > > Can someone clarify this issue for me? > > And regards to Zsolt Kereszty while referencing his acquisition of > NWA12692 LL3.00 > > "Here is the MetBull page of the NWA12692 LL3.00 meteorite:" > > https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=70116 > ______________________________________________ > > Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the > Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >
______________________________________________ Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
