Yes. That.

On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 4:50 AM Thierry Arnoux <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear fellow Metamathers,
>
> I think I've got it: I'll define "TarskiGLD
> <http://us2.metamath.org/mpeuni/df-trkgld.html>" as a relation, where ` G
> TarskiGLD N ` holds whenever ` G ` is a Tarskian geometry of dimension ` N
> ` or more. This does the trick without introducing any new syntax.
>
> Sorry for answering so quickly, and to my own post!
>
> _
> Thierry
>
>
> On 23/11/2019 17:33, Thierry Arnoux wrote:
>
> Dear fellow Metamathers,
>
> When introducing new concepts in Metamath, as a convention, I always try
> to define new *classes*, which are then either class builders, functions
> or operations, instead of introducing a new syntax notation (BTW, where is
> this "convention" written down? I think this is not exactly what the "*new
> definitions infrequent* <http://us2.metamath.org/mpeuni/conventions.html>"
> covers).
>
> However I'm a bit stuck with "TarskiGLD
> <http://us2.metamath.org/mpeuni/df-trkgld.html>", the Tarski geometries
> of dimension N or more. I initially wanted them defined as a function of N,
> however I believe the resulting set is a proper class, not allowing me to
> define it as a map-to function. Is there any trick I can use there?
>
> I thought about restricting to structures, like ` TarskiGLD = ( N e. NN
> |-> { g e. dom Struct | ... } ) ` , but dom Struct is also a proper class.
>
> Right now, my latest pull request
> <https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/pull/1266/files> has a new syntax
> notation "TarskiGLD ( N )" for that concept, but I would be interested in
> any suggestion!
>
> Thanks in advance for your insight!
>
> _
> Thierry
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/b0f0074a-00ad-15aa-dda7-cccb5d1fe98b%40gmx.net
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/b0f0074a-00ad-15aa-dda7-cccb5d1fe98b%40gmx.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/912d97ea-6bd8-403a-7ec8-54434ac1d44f%40gmx.net
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/912d97ea-6bd8-403a-7ec8-54434ac1d44f%40gmx.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSvrE%2Bt%2Bzn634MsDfVaPXBu514Ep_%3DPSk-9WAyDC-JUQdA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to