>On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 17:42:39 +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: >> This and many other artifacts, like the explicit substitution >> constructors, should eventually be removed (unless they are desired, in >> some situation) by the program _consuming_ this proof, which is still to >> be written.
There's no way to know for certain without trying, but I expect that an automated tool could simplify a number of these expressions. The result might be a smaller monster. --- David A.Wheeler -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/7E0E8E96-BFF6-43B7-B7BC-6633EBC220F8%40dwheeler.com.
