Only definitions dfif6 and dfif7 fail the true/false theorems: you can
prove ( -. ph -> ( if- ( ph , ps , ch ) <-> -. -. ch ) ) in these cases. As
Jim says none of the different variations are particularly useful unless ph
is decidable, but I have a preference for dfif5 because it is the only one
that *implies* that ph is decidable, so you can put it to use in negative
position as well.

On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 11:16 AM Jim Kingdon <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 10/5/19 3:53 AM, Benoit wrote:
>
> > Finally, there are several possible definitions (~df-bj-if, ~bj-dfif2
> > through ~bj-dfif7).  Which one to take as *the* definition ?  The
> > current one might be the easiest to understand. On the other hand, I
> > think that one should take one for which the two theorems ~bj-iftru
> > and ~bj-iffal still hold intuitionistically.  I haven't checked all
> > variants, but I think this works for ~bj-dfif2, which furthermore has
> > no negation in it.  This would favor that one.
>
> Using bj-difif2 would (intuitionistically) gain bj-iffal but (I think)
> lose bj-casesif (and probably a lot of other ways of demonstrating
> if(ph, ps, ch)).
>
> I suspect that none of this is very useful intuitionistically unless ph
> is decidable (see for example
> http://us2.metamath.org:88/ileuni/pm2.54dc.html ). Which probably makes
> me lean towards the more straightforward df-bj-if
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/afb962aa-8b41-cdad-2ffa-e6dd4f6e8c93%40panix.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSs6m4132W1Qrv6A1xCAh7iz54KCvJQWm95GjkYLCTHA2A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to