On 6/10/2026 5:26 AM, Yogesh Hegde wrote:
On 6/9/26 19:35, Ryan Eatmon wrote:
On 6/9/2026 5:30 AM, Yogesh Hegde wrote:
Beaglebadge has only 256Mb OSPI flash and except for
arago-bootstrap-base-image and arago-tiny-image other arago images
doesn't fit into OSPI flash. Hence remove ubifs and ubi from
IMAGE_FSTYPES to prevent unnecessary image generation and build
failures when adding packages to the arago-default-image.
Those who want to run arago-bootstrap-base-image and arago-tiny-image
on OSPI can enable UBIFS in local.conf .
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Hegde <[email protected]>
---
meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
b/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
index 78525030..5295296d 100644
--- a/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
+++ b/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@
require conf/machine/include/am62lxx.inc
-IMAGE_FSTYPES += "ubifs ubi"
-
If you are going to remove that then shouldn't ALL of the UBI settings (below)
also be removed as it does not make sense to configure something we are not
building?
The intention behind keeping `MKUBIFS_ARGS` and `UBINIZE_ARGS` is to give a
reference for those who want to enable UBIFS
via local.conf. They don't have to calculate these values.
Machine config still defines the hardware max limits while users get to choose if they build UBIFS or not.
If this is not valid reason, I will send a v2 with fixes.
Please remove them. If we are saying that we should not support UBI on
this machine, then we should not pretend to support it. If someone
needs to recover those then they can look at the git logs and see what
the values were when we removed it.
On the other hand, if we are saying that UBI is supported then we should
not be turning it off and instead work to address the bigger issue of
not building UBI for the default image.
What is the actual issue we are trying to address? We have not seen any
build issues related to this platform that would spark the need for this
patch. Please provide a little more context so that we can choose the
best course to address it.
MKUBIFS_ARGS ?= "-F -m 4096 -e 258048 -c 8500"
UBINIZE_ARGS ?= "-m 4096 -p 256KiB -s 1024 -O 1024"
--
Ryan Eatmon [email protected]
-----------------------------------------
Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20006):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/20006
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/119720440/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
