On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 09:43:31AM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote: > On 4/15/26 6:58 AM, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > Can I ask TI once more to rethink this considering that meta-ti is used > > by users of your SoC, but not of your EVK/SK ? > > > > We do think a lot about external users of meta-ti, we even made a whole > split out reference layer (meta-beagle) that we treat like a normal vendor > layer so that we can more easily identify when we are making bad assumptions > that only apply to our EVM/SK boards. Yes we do still sometimes get it wrong, > and so we are very happy that you are providing the feedback that you have > and helping point out those cases. > > If I'm not mistaken the initramfs topic is the only outstanding case > where what goes in the SoC file vs board files is still open and we > should continue to try to find the best solution. >
Thanks a lot Andrew, I really appreciate this message. I do not mind at all bugs or sending patches or having some temporary workaround in our layers, I was concerned we were not on the same page on the main topic here. Your message solves all of these concerns. In case you want to have a look at Toradex OE machine conf files they are here [1], and here [2] you can find as an example verdin-am62. Francesco [1] https://git.toradex.com/meta-toradex-ti.git/tree/conf/machine [2] https://git.toradex.com/meta-toradex-ti.git/tree/conf/machine/verdin-am62.conf
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19851): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/19851 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/118838695/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
