Hi Andrew, Ryan,
On 3/17/26 8:21 AM, Ryan Eatmon wrote:
On 3/16/2026 5:19 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 3/16/26 5:18 PM, Judith Mendez wrote:
There have been changes in k3-am62x* overlays due to conflicts
in DT, so update KERNEL_DEVICETREE_PREFIX for AM62A SK appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <[email protected]>
---
meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am62axx-evm.conf | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am62axx-evm.conf b/meta-ti-bsp/
conf/machine/am62axx-evm.conf
index 32ae2490..01955470 100644
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am62axx-evm.conf
+++ b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am62axx-evm.conf
@@ -6,7 +6,13 @@ require conf/machine/include/am62axx.inc
KERNEL_DEVICETREE_PREFIX = " \
ti/k3-am62a7 \
- ti/k3-am62x-sk \
+ ti/k3-am62x-sk-csi2 \
"ti/k3-am62x-sk" is already a prefix of "ti/k3-am62x-sk-csi2", does
this change do anything?
I am removing ti/k3-am62x-sk first andrew.
Andrew,
If you are right, then this locks the machine down to not pick up future
additions under the ti/k3-am62x-sk pattern in the future. That's what
it does... which would not be "Good (TM)" if you are correct.
Some ti/k3-am62x-* overlays no longer apply to am62a platform. We can
keep ti/k3-am62x-sk but it will cause confusion since at least the
following overlays no longer apply to am62a:
k3-am62x-sk-dmtimer-pwm.dtso
k3-am62x-sk-mcan.dtso
Is there some kind of blacklist for overlays not to be included for a
platform?
~ Judith
+ ti/k3-am62x-sk-ecap-capture \
+ ti/k3-am62x-sk-eqep \
+ ti/k3-am62x-sk-hdmi \
+ ti/k3-am62x-sk-lpm \
+ ti/k3-am62x-sk-mcspi-loopback \
+ ti/k3-am62x-sk-pwm \
ti/k3-fpdlink \
ti/k3-v3link \
"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#19740):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/19740
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/118355009/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
