On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 07:22 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:

>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 01:58:45AM -0700, Sadik via lists.yoctoproject.org
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 12:28 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 12:08:36PM -0500, Ryan Eatmon via
> > > lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 3/9/2026 12:01 PM, Mahammed Sadik Shaik wrote:
> > > > >Add -ffile-prefix-map flags to KCFLAGS to remove build path
> > > > >references from kernel module compilation, ensuring reproducible
> > > > >builds and preventing absolute path leakage in binaries.
> > > > >
> > > > >This resolves buildpaths QA warnings during packaging.
> > > > >
> > > > >Signed-off-by: Mahammed Sadik Shaik <[email protected]>
> > > > >---
> > > > >  meta-ti-extras/recipes-ti/jailhouse/ti-jailhouse.inc | 4 ++--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > >diff --git a/meta-ti-extras/recipes-ti/jailhouse/ti-jailhouse.inc
> > > b/meta-ti-extras/recipes-ti/jailhouse/ti-jailhouse.inc
> > > > >index 91076c9e..8308f0e5 100644
> > > > >--- a/meta-ti-extras/recipes-ti/jailhouse/ti-jailhouse.inc
> > > > >+++ b/meta-ti-extras/recipes-ti/jailhouse/ti-jailhouse.inc
> > > > >@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ USER_SPACE_CFLAGS = '${CFLAGS}
> > > -DLIBEXECDIR=\\\"${libexecdir}\\\" \
> > > > >  TOOLS_SRC_DIR = "${S}/tools"
> > > > >-EXTRA_OEMAKE = "ARCH=${JH_ARCH} CROSS_COMPILE=${TARGET_PREFIX}
> CC="${CC}"
> > > KDIR=${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR}"
> > > > >-
> > > > >+EXTRA_OEMAKE = "ARCH=${JH_ARCH} CROSS_COMPILE=${TARGET_PREFIX}
> CC="${CC}"
> > > KDIR=${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR} \
> > > > >+    KCFLAGS='-ffile-prefix-map=${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR}/=
> > > -ffile-prefix-map=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/='"
> > > > >  do_compile() {
> > > > >          oe_runmake V=1
> > > > >  }
> > > 
> > > Can you move V=1 into EXTRA_OEMAKE and remove overriding do_compile()
> > 
> > Thanks for the review Denys, Apologies for multiple replies was facing some
> issues with relply all in mail.
> > 
> > Moving V=1 into EXTRA_OEMAKE is fine, but we can't remove the do_compile()
> override. . This is insufficient for jailhouse, which requires building:
> > 1. Kernel modules (driver/jailhouse.ko)
> > 2. Hypervisor binary (hypervisor/jailhouse.bin)
> > 3. Userspace tools (tools/jailhouse, jailhouse-*)
> > 4. Inmate demos (inmates/demos/*) — causing the install failure for all
> the demos during the build.
> > 
> > The do_compile() override is needed to run a plain oe_runmake which hits
> jailhouse's top-level Makefile and builds the full project.
> 
> The default do_compile() does exactly that - calls oe_runmake:
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/classes-global/base.bbclass#n399

Yeah you are right, that the default base_do_compile() calls oe_runmake, which 
would work fine. But, the jailhouse recipe inherits module bbclass,
"inherit module python3native bash-completion deploy "
 which overrides default do_compile() with module_do_compile. resulting in 
compilation errors if do_compile override is removed.
If I don't use the do-compile override I am still getting build errors. I am 
unable to remove the module bbclass is required for building jailhouse kernel 
modules.

> 
> 
> > If necessary I can send an V3 by moving V=1 into EXTRA_OEMAKE, but that
> doesn't serve our purpose of completely overriding the do_compile
> > And also I couldn't find an existing bbclass that does "run the top-level
> Makefile and build everything."
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Thank you.  I was going to comment on the v1 to not disable buildpaths.
> > > 
> > > +1
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#19692): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/19692
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/118225330/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to