On 1/24/2025 3:54 PM, Randolph Sapp wrote:
Hey, Asking for some general advice before I submit the next series. Cleaning up meta-qt* package groups and everything there is a bit of a logistical argument to be made. We now have an official requirement tracking Qt6 enablement which means more automated testing. At the same time I do not think meta-arago should be inherently dependent on a layer as heavy as meta-qt*. I'm planning on making a series of isolated package groups and configs that can be toggled through a distro feature. Where do we think this should belong? The distro layer or the extras layer? I'm leaning toward the distro layer as these are ultimately distro specific configs, but I can understand that some may believe this is inherently "extra" content. Regardless, the test layer will need to be updated to point to this. Maybe it should be a generic "software" layer? I don't like splitting things unnecessarily, but this is a weird example where we need certain features enabled for both testing and release, but it doesn't really make sense to duplicate it. No clue. Any opinions?
Could it be argued that these are demos? And maybe should be in meta-arago-demos?
What all software are we talking about being dependent on qt6?
Regards, Randolph
-- Ryan Eatmon [email protected] ----------------------------------------- Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15763): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/message/15763 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/110799093/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
