On Monday, November 02, 2015 04:29:25 PM Matt Turner wrote: > The generator asserts that this is true (and presumably it's useful in > some optimization passes?) and the VF fs_reg constructors did this (by > virtue of the fact that it doesn't override what init() does). > > In the next commit, calling this constructor with brw_imm_* will > generate an IMM file register rather than a HW_REG, making this change > necessary to avoid breakage with existing uses of brw_imm_v(). > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > index 91eaf61..92a9437 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > @@ -427,6 +427,12 @@ fs_reg::fs_reg(struct brw_reg reg) : > this->subreg_offset = 0; > this->reladdr = NULL; > this->stride = 1; > + if (this->file == IMM && > + (this->type != BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_V && > + this->type != BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UV && > + this->type != BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_VF)) { > + this->stride = 0; > + } > } > > bool >
It's confusing that your subject says "Set stride to 1 for vector immediate types" yet your code sets stride to 0. I would suggest renaming the patch to "i965/fs: Set stride correctly for immediates in fs_reg(brw_reg)" and adding some text to the commit message like: "The fs_reg() constructors for immediates set stride to 0, except for vector-immediates, which set stride to 1. This patch makes the fs_reg constructor that takes a brw_reg do likewise, so that stride is set correctly for cases such as fs_reg(brw_imm_v(...))." Regardless, Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev