Am 10.11.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Rowley, Timothy O: > >> On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> wrote: >> >> They do share a lot already, Mesa, gallium statetracker, and gallivm. If >> further development in openswr is planned, it might require to jump through >> a few hoops, but I think it's worth to figure out what would take to get >> this merged into master so that, whenever there are interface changes, >> openswer won't get the short stick. > > Yes, openswr and llvmpipe share a fair bit. It is my hope that as we start > working more on openswr performance, some of the effort will benefit both > drivers. > > We’re willing to jump through the hoops needed to merge into master. To that > end, I’ve pushed some updates that amongst other things allow us to support > both llvm 3.6 and 3.7 (and possibly llvm-svn). Are there any other hoops > that spring to mind? >
FWIW this looks ok to me. You didn't really touch any shared code apart from adding some extern C wrappers, so there's not much to review there. Plus of course some build changes, which seem fairly obvious though someone else might want to look at that. I didn't look that closely at the driver bits but as long as you're able to maintain it it should be fine... Roland _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
