On 6 November 2015 at 21:13, Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 13:16 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 5 November 2015 at 11:17, Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >> > From: Timothy Arceri <timothy.arc...@collabora.com> >> > >> > This is in preperation for compile-time constant support. >> typo "preparation" >> >> > >> > Also fix up the locations for some of the extension checking >> > error messages in the parser. We now correctly give the location >> > of the layout qualifier identifier rather than the integer constant. >> > >> > The validation is moved to two locations, for validation on variables the >> > checks are moved to the ast to hir pass and for qualifiers that apply to >> > the >> > shader the validation is moved into glsl_parser_extras.cpp. >> > >> > In order to do validation at the later stage in glsl_parser_extras.cpp we >> > need to temporarily add a field in ast_type_qualifier to keep track of the >> > parser location, this will be removed in a following patch when we >> > introduce a new type for storing the comiple-time qualifiers. >> > >> > Also as the set_shader_inout_layout() function in glsl parser extras is >> > normally called after all validation is done we need to move the code that >> > sets CompileStatus and InfoLog otherwise the newly moved error messages >> > will >> > be ignored. >> Personally I would split the validate_layout_qualifiers() introduction >> and the CompileStatus/InfoLog movement into separate patches. > > The reason for not doing this in a new patch is that this is existing > functionality not new functionality, doing so would regress a bunch of piglit > tests. > > I can do it if it makes things easier to review but it should all be pushed as > one. > Fair enough - I'd just keep in as it then. I'll take a closer look at some time today/tomorrow.
<rant> Imho if one needs to made a few different things at once, this is a clear indication that things are more convoluted as they should be. </rant> Cheers, Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev