Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstr...@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Connor Abbott <cwabbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > For some reason, this causes assertions on gm965 only. In any case, it's > unnecessary since we don't need liveness information in the post-RA > scheduler. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92744 > Cc: Mark Janes <mark.a.ja...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbo...@gmail.com> > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp > index 2698399..88c45f7 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp > @@ -1702,7 +1702,8 @@ instruction_scheduler::run(cfg_t *cfg) > void > fs_visitor::schedule_instructions(instruction_scheduler_mode mode) > { > - calculate_live_intervals(); > + if (mode != SCHEDULE_POST) > + calculate_live_intervals(); > > int grf_count; > if (mode == SCHEDULE_POST) > -- > 2.4.3 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
