On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas <nota...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 29 October 2015 at 15:22, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot >> <emmanuel.pey...@collabora.com> wrote: >>> This was causing compilation issues when one of its providers wasn’t >>> already included before gbm.h. >> Cc: "11.0" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org> >> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> >> >> I'll push this later on today. For future patches please include your >> s-o-b line. > > Some of you keep insisting on adding s-o-b while the site says it's > not needed ( http://www.mesa3d.org/devinfo.html , "Patch formatting"). > Maybe devinfo.html should be updated?
I think it's kind of meaningless without an explanation of what it means. The Linux kernel has a "Developer Certificate of Origin" in Documentation/SubmittingPatches that explains what it means in that context. I'm not sure what lead the Linux community to create that and require S-o-b and the certificate of origin. That seems like an important question to answer before we start requiring S-o-b. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
