On Friday, October 02, 2015 12:08:07 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> > wrote: > > get_io_offset() already walks the dereference chain and discovers > > whether or not we have an indirect; we can just return that rather than > > computing it a second time. This means moving the call a bit earlier. > > > > More importantly, I'm about to introduce special handling for the > > outermost array index, which would require changing the dereference > > we pass to deref_has_indirect(). Or we can just eliminate that. > > I think I actually like what we did in nir_lower_samplers a bit > better. There we just made indirect a nir_ssa_def* and NULL means no > indirect. Since these passes all happen while we're in SSA form, that > works pretty well. Thoughts?
Yeah, I like that better. I'll resend.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
