On 14 September 2015 at 10:36, Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 4 September 2015 at 19:57, Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I compiled a toolchain based on LLVM/Clang v3.7.0 today and tested it >>> with an updated version of my Linux Graphics driver stack (see >>> attached logs). >>> >>> Here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 I required two patches (see attached 0001 >>> and 0002) post-mesa-10.6.5+ to build it successfully. >>> Feel free to cherry-pick them to 10.6 Git branch. >>> >> Ftr the attached patches are master commits >> 147ffd48166d851341cadd12de98895f32ec25a2 gallivm: Do not use >> NoFramePointerElim with LLVM 3.7. >> 09d6243aed016eed4518435c9885275dbb6d2aa9 gallivm: Workaround LLVM PR23628. >> >> Both of which seems like trivial and non-evasive changes imho, so >> unless there are any objections I'll scoop them. >> Iirc on the radeon side, more work is needed. So picking these won't >> imply that building mesa 10.6.x with llvm 3.7 is officially supported >> and/or tested. But a bit of "try it, if you're crazy enough" :-) >> >> Thanks Sedat ! >> > > Yes, both patches where cherry-picked from Git master for mesa-10.6. > > What does your statement means in the end... > Will those 2 patches go into mesa-10.6 (be included in mesa v10.6.8)? > It means two things - they will (are) picked, considering the lack of objections. - building with/against llvm 3.7 is entirely at your own risk and not officially supported :-)
I can see how my earlier reply was a bit confusing, hopefully thing one is a tad clearer. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
