On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 02:26:56 AM Marek Olšák wrote: > From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com> > > A user can be using Mesa 11.0, but /etc/drirc can be from Mesa 10.5. > We don't want the old drirc to affect Mesa 11.0. > > There are 2 options: > - use a different file name (e.g. /etc/drirc_global) for people wanting > a global drirc file, but they must supply it by themselves > - just don't load it, users should use ~/.drirc > > This patch implements the latter. > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/xmlconfig.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
I don't really get the rationale. /etc/drirc could be properly managed by the package manager - shipped alongside *_dri.so in the same package. Maybe it isn't today, but it could be handled well. But ~/.drirc is entirely in the users control. Neither the distros nor us can manage what the user puts there. It's *very* likely to be stale... --Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
