From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>
The bug was misunderstood. Besides that, the bug affects a DB feature we
don't use yet.
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
index 863991c..c628288 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
@@ -1990,10 +1990,6 @@ static void si_init_depth_surface(struct si_context
*sctx,
db_htile_surface = 0;
}
- /* Bug workaround. */
- if (sctx->b.chip_class >= VI)
- s_info |= S_028044_TILE_STENCIL_DISABLE(1);
-
assert(levelinfo->nblk_x % 8 == 0 && levelinfo->nblk_y % 8 == 0);
surf->db_depth_view =
S_028008_SLICE_START(surf->base.u.tex.first_layer) |
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
