https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91591
Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop. |matts...@gmail.com
|org |
--- Comment #2 from Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> ---
My change only makes an existing bug surface.
Even without my change I believe the warning
rounding.h:107:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void
[-Wreturn-type]
was probably there, ever since Matt's commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=680de24545d23d0c2b699020267ca484f81a04a9
. But because it was not fatal, it was easy to miss.
As I said to Matt on mesa-dev ML, it sounds like LONG_BIT is not standard.
MinGW/MSVC at least don't define it. It looks like not all Linux define it
neither.
There was a discussion about on Stack Overflow, but is not very conclusive.
On my system, LONG_BIT is defined in
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/xopen_lim.h
And /usr/include/limits.h includes it, but not unconditionally:
#ifdef __USE_XOPEN
# include <bits/xopen_lim.h>
#endif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
