On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com> wrote: > However, I don't agree that the driver interface should be removed. > In my opinion, it is a driver specific decision if glMemoryBarrierByRegion > should be > implemented directly on top of glMemoryBarrier or if you want to do some > optimizations.
It's as simple as "don't add it if you don't need it". If another driver needs the driver interface to implement glMemoryBarrierByRegion, then it should be added. As it stands now, I don't see that i965 needs it. > Why else would there be a specific glMemoryBarrierByRegion > function added to the standard? Non-sequitur. There are plenty of functions in the GL API that don't have entries in the dd function table. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
