Oh, fair enough then.
On Aug 3, 2015 12:39 PM, "Ilia Mirkin" <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Given that this is a debug-only thing, I doubt perf numbers are that
> interesting.
>
> I have no clue what the diff is between the two hash tables, but if
> one is allegedly faster than the other, that should be determined, and
> we should just mass-migrate...
>
> -ilia
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Chris Forbes <chr...@ijw.co.nz> wrote:
> > Some perf numbers would be nice. How much is this winning?
> >
> > - Chris
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 19:50 +0200, Alejandro Seguí wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe just for completeness you could add this to the commit message
> >>
> >> The util/hash_table was intended to be a fast hash table
> >> replacement for the program/hash_table see 35fd61bd99c1 and
> 72e55bb6888ff.
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> src/glsl/ir_print_visitor.cpp | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/src/glsl/ir_print_visitor.cpp
> b/src/glsl/ir_print_visitor.cpp
> >>> index 78475f3..641a996 100644
> >>> --- a/src/glsl/ir_print_visitor.cpp
> >>> +++ b/src/glsl/ir_print_visitor.cpp
> >>> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> >>> #include "glsl_types.h"
> >>> #include "glsl_parser_extras.h"
> >>> #include "main/macros.h"
> >>> -#include "program/hash_table.h"
> >>> +#include "util/hash_table.h"
> >>>
> >>> static void print_type(FILE *f, const glsl_type *t);
> >>>
> >>> @@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ ir_print_visitor::ir_print_visitor(FILE *f)
> >>> {
> >>> indentation = 0;
> >>> printable_names =
> >>> - hash_table_ctor(32, hash_table_pointer_hash,
> >>> hash_table_pointer_compare);
> >>> + _mesa_hash_table_create(NULL, _mesa_hash_pointer,
> >>> _mesa_key_pointer_equal);
> >>> symbols = _mesa_symbol_table_ctor();
> >>> mem_ctx = ralloc_context(NULL);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> ir_print_visitor::~ir_print_visitor()
> >>> {
> >>> - hash_table_dtor(printable_names);
> >>> + _mesa_hash_table_destroy(printable_names, NULL);
> >>> _mesa_symbol_table_dtor(symbols);
> >>> ralloc_free(mem_ctx);
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -121,9 +121,14 @@ ir_print_visitor::unique_name(ir_variable *var)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /* Do we already have a name for this variable? */
> >>> - const char *name = (const char *)
> hash_table_find(this->printable_names,
> >>> var);
> >>> - if (name != NULL)
> >>> - return name;
> >>> + struct hash_entry * entry =
> >>> + _mesa_hash_table_search(this->printable_names, var);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (entry != NULL) {
> >>> + return (const char *) entry->data;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + const char* name = NULL;
> >>
> >> The above looks a bit funny just floating here maybe move it
> >>
> >>>
> >>> /* If there's no conflict, just use the original name */
> >> Here.
> >>> if (_mesa_symbol_table_find_symbol(this->symbols, -1, var->name) ==
> >>> NULL) {
> >>> @@ -132,7 +137,7 @@ ir_print_visitor::unique_name(ir_variable *var)
> >>> static unsigned i = 1;
> >>> name = ralloc_asprintf(this->mem_ctx, "%s@%u", var->name, ++i);
> >>> }
> >>> - hash_table_insert(this->printable_names, (void *) name, var);
> >>> + _mesa_hash_table_insert(this->printable_names, var, (void *) name);
> >>> _mesa_symbol_table_add_symbol(this->symbols, -1, name, var);
> >>> return name;
> >>> }
> >>
> >> With those couple of small changes you can add to the commit message
> >> Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mesa-dev mailing list
> >> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
