Ccing Tom Thank you Igor !
On 07/07/15 11:05, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > We must have versioned library in mesa.icd, because ICD loader would > fail if the mesa-devel package wasn't installed. > > Reported-by: Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deut...@gmx.de> > Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73512 > Cc: "10.6" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org> > Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com> Similar to the default location of the .icd file, this is another picky topic. Negardless I think we should go ahead with this patch. Why ? First let's see what others do: - nvidia - versioned soname, resides in lib. The full soname is used. - catalyst - no soname, resides in lib. libamdocl32/64.so is used. - beignet - unversioned soname, resides in lib/foo. Full library path is used and no version. - the spec - does not mention anything about soname, versioning or location. The example gives a plain libVendorAOpenCL.so. Based off this one can assume that it should live in lib, although everything else remains open. As our lovely build always sets SONAME (even when -module is set), the Fedora guys are doing (have been shipping) it correctly. With all that said, do we have any comments/objections against this patch ? Thanks, Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
