On Monday, July 06, 2015 12:18:18 PM Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote: > > It looks like this was forgotten in commit 3c9dc2d31b80fc73bffa1f40a > > (i965: Make a brw_stage_prog_data for storing the SURF_INDEX > > information.) In other words, it's been missing since we moved to > > dynamic binding table slot assignments. > > Author: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > AuthorDate: Wed Oct 2 14:07:40 2013 -0700 > CommitDate: Tue Oct 15 10:18:42 2013 -0700 > > Dang. > > How did you find this?
After reading Eero's latest performance analysis observations, I decided to try marking render targets uncached (MOCS = UC) when blending and logic ops (i.e. things that cause render target reads) are disabled. This necessitated adding _NEW_COLOR. Then I realized BRW_NEW_FS_PROG_DATA was just plain missing.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
