Current logic re-writes the same data when existing data is found.
Not that this actually matters at the moment in practice, the
contraint for finding matching data is too severe to ever allow
data to be shared between two items in the cache.
CC: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com>
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_cache.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_cache.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_cache.c
index 97a41b9..d42b4b4 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_cache.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_cache.c
@@ -314,6 +314,13 @@ brw_upload_cache(struct brw_cache *cache,
*/
if (!brw_try_upload_using_copy(cache, item, data, aux)) {
item->offset = brw_alloc_item_data(cache, data_size);
+
+ /* Copy data to the buffer */
+ if (brw->has_llc) {
+ memcpy((char *)cache->bo->virtual + item->offset, data, data_size);
+ } else {
+ drm_intel_bo_subdata(cache->bo, item->offset, data_size, data);
+ }
}
/* Set up the memory containing the key and aux_data */
@@ -332,13 +339,6 @@ brw_upload_cache(struct brw_cache *cache,
cache->items[hash] = item;
cache->n_items++;
- /* Copy data to the buffer */
- if (brw->has_llc) {
- memcpy((char *) cache->bo->virtual + item->offset, data, data_size);
- } else {
- drm_intel_bo_subdata(cache->bo, item->offset, data_size, data);
- }
-
*out_offset = item->offset;
*(void **)out_aux = (void *)((char *)item->key + item->key_size);
cache->brw->ctx.NewDriverState |= 1 << cache_id;
--
1.9.3
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
