On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:18:13 AM Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 10:36 AM, Tapani wrote:
> > On 05/26/2015 10:37 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >> From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>
> >>
> >> This is a bit of a hack for now. Several of the extensions required for
> >> OpenGL ES 3.1 have no support, at all, in Mesa. However, with this
> >> patch and a patch to allow MESA_GL_VERSION_OVERRIDE to work with ES
> >> contexts, people can begin testing the ES "version" of the functionality
> >> that is supported.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> src/mesa/main/getstring.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> >> src/mesa/main/version.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/mesa/main/getstring.c b/src/mesa/main/getstring.c
> >> index 1b2c7f0..72d99ca 100644
> >> --- a/src/mesa/main/getstring.c
> >> +++ b/src/mesa/main/getstring.c
> >> @@ -72,10 +72,18 @@ shading_language_version(struct gl_context *ctx)
> >> break;
> >> case API_OPENGLES2:
> >> - return (ctx->Version < 30)
> >> - ? (const GLubyte *) "OpenGL ES GLSL ES 1.0.16"
> >> - : (const GLubyte *) "OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.00";
> >> -
> >> + switch (ctx->Version) {
> >> + case 20:
> >> + return (const GLubyte *) "OpenGL ES GLSL ES 1.0.16";
> >
> > There's revision 17 (1.0.17) out there, should we have it here or rather
> > just 1.0?
>
> We could bump it or leave it. I don't think it matters much either way.
> Section 6.1.5 (String Queries) of the OpenGL ES 2.0.25 spec says:
>
> "The SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION string is laid out as follows:
>
> "OpenGL ES GLSL ES N.M vendor-specific information"
>
> The version number is either of the form major_number.minor_number
> or major_number.minor_number.release_number, where the numbers all
> have one or more digits. The release number and vendor specific
> information are optional. However, if present, then they pertain
> to the server and their format and contents are implementation-
> dependent."I think I'd rather just advertise 1.0 - I don't think 1.0.X communicates any real useful information to applications. We don't do that for regular GLSL. *shrug* --Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
