On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26/05/15 14:04, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>
>>
>> ---
>> src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_llvm.h | 5 ++---
>> src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_setup_tgsi_llvm.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_llvm.h
>> b/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_llvm.h
>> index 8612ef8..ec4c343 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_llvm.h
>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_llvm.h
>> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>>
>> #define RADEON_LLVM_MAX_INPUTS 32 * 4
>> #define RADEON_LLVM_MAX_OUTPUTS 32 * 4
>> -#define RADEON_LLVM_MAX_ARRAYS 16
>>
>> #define RADEON_LLVM_INITIAL_CF_DEPTH 4
>>
>> @@ -130,8 +129,8 @@ struct radeon_llvm_context {
>> unsigned loop_depth;
>> unsigned loop_depth_max;
>>
>> - struct tgsi_declaration_range arrays[RADEON_LLVM_MAX_ARRAYS];
>> - unsigned num_arrays;
>> + struct tgsi_declaration_range *arrays;
>> + unsigned max_num_arrays;
>>
>> LLVMValueRef main_fn;
>>
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_setup_tgsi_llvm.c
>> b/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_setup_tgsi_llvm.c
>> index 8638537..af5eb88 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_setup_tgsi_llvm.c
>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_setup_tgsi_llvm.c
>> @@ -85,8 +85,9 @@ get_array_range(struct lp_build_tgsi_context *bld_base,
>> unsigned File, const struct tgsi_ind_register *reg)
>> {
>> struct radeon_llvm_context * ctx = radeon_llvm_context(bld_base);
>> +
>> if (File != TGSI_FILE_TEMPORARY || reg->ArrayID == 0 ||
>> - reg->ArrayID > RADEON_LLVM_MAX_ARRAYS) {
>> + reg->ArrayID-1 >= ctx->max_num_arrays) {
>> struct tgsi_declaration_range range;
>> range.First = 0;
>> range.Last = bld_base->info->file_max[File];
>> @@ -252,8 +253,14 @@ static void emit_declaration(
>> }
>>
>> case TGSI_FILE_TEMPORARY:
>> - if (decl->Declaration.Array && decl->Array.ArrayID <=
>> RADEON_LLVM_MAX_ARRAYS)
>> + if (decl->Declaration.Array) {
>> + if (decl->Array.ArrayID-1 >= ctx->max_num_arrays) {
>> + ctx->max_num_arrays += 32;
>> + ctx->arrays = realloc(ctx->arrays,
> You should use the REALLOC wrapper, considering the FREE below.
>
>> + sizeof(ctx->arrays[0]) *
>> ctx->max_num_arrays);
>> + }
>> ctx->arrays[decl->Array.ArrayID - 1] = decl->Range;
>> + }
>> if (uses_temp_indirect_addressing(bld_base)) {
>> lp_emit_declaration_soa(bld_base, decl);
>> break;
>> @@ -1432,8 +1439,6 @@ void radeon_llvm_context_init(struct
>> radeon_llvm_context * ctx)
>> /* Allocate outputs */
>> ctx->soa.outputs = ctx->outputs;
>>
>> - ctx->num_arrays = 0;
>> -
>> /* XXX: Is there a better way to initialize all this ? */
>>
>> lp_set_default_actions(bld_base);
>> @@ -1622,6 +1627,8 @@ void radeon_llvm_dispose(struct radeon_llvm_context *
>> ctx)
>> {
>> LLVMDisposeModule(ctx->soa.bld_base.base.gallivm->module);
>> LLVMContextDispose(ctx->soa.bld_base.base.gallivm->context);
>> + FREE(ctx->arrays);
>> + ctx->arrays = NULL;
> Not particularly familiar with the radeon driver(s) so this might come a
> bit silly - shouldn't one zero max_num_arrays at this stage ?
Yes, I've sent a new patch for that.
>
> Similar counters (temps_count, output_reg_count) seems to be left
> unchanged, while others (branch_depth_max, loop_depth_max) are reset.
I've sent a patch for temps_count. I'm not touching output_reg_count,
because it's only used by the dying r600g LLVM backend.
Marek
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
