https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79706
--- Comment #2 from Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> --- Actually I was contemplating on bringing back the "per release" regression tracker idea which brought us here in the first place. It will give us a clearer picture of the regressions when planning/doing the releasing. How would people feel on the topic ? One small catch is that the regressions reported by the Intel QA might cause spam as they're lacking the "bisected" "regression" keywords and the Product Version is "unspecified". Matt any ideas if we can have these with the original report - who can we speak to about this ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
