On 05/14/2015 03:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 13/05/15 19:44, Ian Romanick wrote: >> We've known for a long time that having all those tags in the <function> >> entries in the XML is bad. For example, people cut-and-paste for >> everything, and, as a result, we export a bunch of functions that we >> should not. We also really want to just use the Khronos XML. >> >> This series takes a couple small steps towards that. >> >> Patches 1 and 2 are just a couple of clean-ups to prevent regressions in >> later patches. >> >> Patches 3, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 remove the offset= tags from the XML. >> Patch 15 was quite large, so it was trimmed. >> >> Patches 4, 5, and 6 remove the static_dispatch= tags from the XML. >> Patch 5 was quite large, so it was trimmed. >> >> Patches 7 through 12 un-export a bunch of static dispatch functions. At >> the end, we only export the functions that Mesa 10.3 and NVIDIA and AMD >> export (with a couple minor exceptions noted in patches 8 and 11. >> > What are your thoughts on having patches 01-17 for 10.6 ? I would > _really_ love if they make it, plus I'm open on picking them after the > branch point.
I'd prefer to land the whole lot, but I'll take what I can get. :) > Other than the comment in patch 02 I did not spot anything wrong with > the yak. Admittedly I did stay away from the mapi magic for quite some time. With the changes to the commit message of patch 2, is that a R-b on the series? > Thanks > Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
