On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:52:04PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Certain platforms support the ability to sample from a texture, and write it > out > to the file RT - thus saving a costly send instructions (note that this is a > potnential win if one wanted to backport to a tag that didn't have the patch > from Topi which removed excess MOVs from LOAD_PAYLOAD - 97caf5fa04dbd2), > > v2: Modify the algorithm. Instead of iterating in reverse through blocks and > insts, since the last block/inst is the only thing which can benefit. Rebased > on top of Ken's patching modifying is_last_send > > v3: Rebased over almost 2 months, and Incorporated feedback from Matt: > Some comment typo fixes and rewordings. > Whitespace > Move the optimization pass outside of the optimize loop > > v4: Some cosmetic changes requested from Ken. These changes ensured that the > optimization function always returned true when an optimization occurred, and > false when one did not. This behavior did not exist with the original patch. > As > a result, having the separate helper function which Matt did not like no > longer > made sense, and so now I believe everyone should be happy. > > Braswell data: > Benchmark (n=20) %diff > *OglBatch5 -1.4 > *OglBatch7 -1.79 > OglFillTexMulti 5.57 > OglFillTexSingle 1.16 > OglShMapPcf 0.05 > OglTexFilterAniso 3.01 > OglTexFilterTri 1.94 > > SKL data: > NONE COLLECTED > > No piglit regressions: > (http://otc-gfxtest-01.jf.intel.com:8080/view/dev/job/bwidawsk/112/) > > [*] I believe my measurements are incorrect for Batch5-7. If I add this new > optimization, but never emit the new instruction I see similar results.
I'm seeing ~7% (with 95% confidence) decrease in OglBatch6/7 when I'm launching resolve clears with the light-weight mechanism provided by blorp. This may be totally unrelated but lets see if I get any smarter. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
