On Fri, Mar 20 2015, Chris Forbes wrote: > I think that having both the existing `struct brw_vs_compile` and a > function with the same name is going to cause confusion. (same with > the other non-fs stages)
In an earlier version of the patch I had brw_vs_do_compile, (there is a "do" precedent in the code being replaced here). I could go back to that if it helps. -Carl
pgpmHnTz9onNG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
