On 04/03/15 02:00, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 27 February 2015 at 23:28, Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/02/15 21:44, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi,
I was building mesa v10.4.4 with my llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2.
My build breaks like this...
...
Please cherry-pick...
commit ef7e0b39a24966526b102643523feac765771842
"gallivm: Update for RTDyldMemoryManager becoming an unique_ptr."
..for mesa 10.4 Git branch.
Hi Sedat,
Picking a fix in a stable branch against a non-final release sounds like
a no-go in our books. As the official llvm 3.6 rolls out we'll pick this
fix for the stable branches - until then I would recommend (a) applying
it locally or (b) using mesa from the 10.5 or master branch.
Just FYI...
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6 Release (see [1]).
Please pick this patch for-10.4, thanks.
As promised, mesa 10.4.6 will feature this.
But is cross-porting this patch enough?
As I said when this first issue was raised fixing the build with LLVM
3.6 is just half of the problem. It must also _run_ correctly. And
building correctly doesn't necessarily means it will run correctly.
That is, unless somebody actually ensures that all LLVM 3.6 related
fixes have been crossported and that things run correctly, it is
misleading to enable the build of Mesa 10.4.6 with LLVM 3.6.
I don't know about radeon drivers, but at least from llvmpipe POV I
simply don't have the time to do this (go through every LLVM 3.6 related
patch, ensure they are all in 10.4.6, and test).
I quickly went through the diffs between 10.4 branch, and found one such
commit is missing:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=74f505fa73eda0c9b5b1984bebb44cedac8e8794
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85467
But there might be more, and I don't know if crossporting this is safe
or not.
Therefore my stance for is that building Mesa stable releases with LLVM
releases after the Mesa release was branched is still unsupported. If
people want to do so, they will do at their own peril. And any incoming
bugs will be "unsupported, use Mesa.
If having a Mesa release capable of building LLVM 3.6 is so important, I
think it might be easier/safer to just make a new release from a recent
enough commit, than trying to backport it.
Jose
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
