On 01/22/2015 10:06 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 15/12/14 12:08, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote: >> On 12/15/2014 12:21 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> >>> Above you've mentioned "test failures were gathered ... against 10.3.3", >>> which brings the question: >>> Should we include those in either one of the 10.3 and 10.4 stable >>> branches ? Or are they so insignificant/trivial that we don't expect >>> (m)any programs to hit them ? >>> >> >> Hi Emil, >> >> We are probably not the right people to answer this, so I will let the >> reviewers take the call. >> >> That said, there are a few patches from these series that fix concrete >> functionality that has an impact on rendering results, so I suppose >> these will be interesting to port to stable branches. >> > From a quick skim at the commit summaries I cannot pick the rendering > fixes. Can you kindly list them out and I'll gladly chase the relevant > people. > >> There are many others that just improve spec compliance and has little >> or no practical impact on functionality, and probably are not worth porting. >> > I guess the spec compliance depends on how many users there are flexing > those code-paths. That aside I do share your view.
I think these are find candidates for 10.5, but I'm not concerned about getting them into earlier release series. > -Emil > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
