On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> > wrote: >> In the common case, this is redundant - we set it a few lines later. >> >> However, when irb->mt->fast_clear_state == INTEL_FAST_CLEAR_STATE_CLEAR, >> this causes irb->need_downsample to be set, even though we skip altering >> the buffer at all. We don't want to do that. > > What is the result of that? Do we end up doing extra work because we > needlessly set need_downsample?
To make sure this doesn't get lost... ping. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
