https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
--- Comment #17 from Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> --- (In reply to Connor Abbott from comment #16) > (In reply to Jason Ekstrand from comment #15) > > (In reply to Connor Abbott from comment #14) > > > I definitely don't want to remove the anonymous union from nir_src. We use > > > it all over the place, and it really helps with readability and > > > writeability. Without it, we would have to say "src[n].src.src.ssa" or > > > "src[n].src.src.reg" for ALU sources, which just seems silly. > > > > The anonymous union isn't the problem. That's fine with --std=gnu99. The > > problem is that they don't work with designated initializers. Now that > > those are gone, NIR builds just fine with --std=gnu99. We're just waiting > > for patch review to finish on the configure.ac patch and we'll be building > > on GCC 4.4 again. > > Sure, I was just replying to Emil's suggestion. Sure. I guess I wasn't reading carefully enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
