On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote:
> BRW_CACHE_VS_PROG is more easily associated with program caches than
> plain BRW_VS_PROG.
>
> While we're at it, rename BRW_WM_PROG to BRW_CACHE_FS_PROG, to move away
> from the outdated Windowizer/Masker name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit.cpp | 4 ++--
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip.c | 4 ++--
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h | 28
> ++++++++++++++--------------
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_ff_gs.c | 4 ++--
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_gs.c | 4 ++--
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_sf.c | 4 ++--
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_cache.c | 12 ++++++------
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_dump.c | 14 +++++++-------
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vs.c | 6 +++---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm.c | 6 +++---
> 10 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit.cpp
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit.cpp
> index 844f5e4..a103af0 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit.cpp
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit.cpp
> @@ -2119,14 +2119,14 @@ brw_blorp_blit_params::get_wm_prog(struct brw_context
> *brw,
> brw_blorp_prog_data **prog_data) const
> {
> uint32_t prog_offset = 0;
> - if (!brw_search_cache(&brw->cache, BRW_BLORP_BLIT_PROG,
> + if (!brw_search_cache(&brw->cache, BRW_CACHE_BLORP_BLIT_PROG,
> &this->wm_prog_key, sizeof(this->wm_prog_key),
> &prog_offset, prog_data)) {
> brw_blorp_blit_program prog(brw, &this->wm_prog_key,
> INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_BLORP);
> GLuint program_size;
> const GLuint *program = prog.compile(brw, &program_size);
> - brw_upload_cache(&brw->cache, BRW_BLORP_BLIT_PROG,
> + brw_upload_cache(&brw->cache, BRW_CACHE_BLORP_BLIT_PROG,
> &this->wm_prog_key, sizeof(this->wm_prog_key),
> program, program_size,
> &prog.prog_data, sizeof(prog.prog_data),
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip.c
> index debeee5..3fef38c 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void compile_clip_prog( struct brw_context *brw,
> }
>
> brw_upload_cache(&brw->cache,
> - BRW_CLIP_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_CLIP_PROG,
> &c.key, sizeof(c.key),
> program, program_size,
> &c.prog_data, sizeof(c.prog_data),
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ brw_upload_clip_prog(struct brw_context *brw)
> }
> }
>
> - if (!brw_search_cache(&brw->cache, BRW_CLIP_PROG,
> + if (!brw_search_cache(&brw->cache, BRW_CACHE_CLIP_PROG,
> &key, sizeof(key),
> &brw->clip.prog_offset, &brw->clip.prog_data)) {
> compile_clip_prog( brw, &key );
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h
> index fac22dc..c4e96de 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h
> @@ -693,13 +693,13 @@ struct brw_gs_prog_data
> #define SHADER_TIME_STRIDE 64
>
> enum brw_cache_id {
> - BRW_WM_PROG,
> - BRW_BLORP_BLIT_PROG,
> - BRW_SF_PROG,
> - BRW_VS_PROG,
> - BRW_FF_GS_PROG,
> - BRW_GS_PROG,
> - BRW_CLIP_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_FS_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_BLORP_BLIT_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_SF_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_VS_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_FF_GS_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_GS_PROG,
> + BRW_CACHE_CLIP_PROG,
>
> BRW_MAX_CACHE
> };
> @@ -777,13 +777,13 @@ enum shader_time_shader_type {
>
> /* Flags for brw->state.cache.
> */
> -#define CACHE_NEW_WM_PROG (1<<BRW_WM_PROG)
> -#define CACHE_NEW_BLORP_BLIT_PROG (1<<BRW_BLORP_BLIT_PROG)
> -#define CACHE_NEW_SF_PROG (1<<BRW_SF_PROG)
> -#define CACHE_NEW_VS_PROG (1<<BRW_VS_PROG)
> -#define CACHE_NEW_FF_GS_PROG (1<<BRW_FF_GS_PROG)
> -#define CACHE_NEW_GS_PROG (1<<BRW_GS_PROG)
> -#define CACHE_NEW_CLIP_PROG (1<<BRW_CLIP_PROG)
> +#define CACHE_NEW_WM_PROG (1 << BRW_CACHE_FS_PROG)
> +#define CACHE_NEW_BLORP_BLIT_PROG (1 << BRW_CACHE_BLORP_BLIT_PROG)
> +#define CACHE_NEW_SF_PROG (1 << BRW_CACHE_SF_PROG)
> +#define CACHE_NEW_VS_PROG (1 << BRW_CACHE_VS_PROG)
> +#define CACHE_NEW_FF_GS_PROG (1 << BRW_CACHE_FF_GS_PROG)
> +#define CACHE_NEW_GS_PROG (1 << BRW_CACHE_GS_PROG)
> +#define CACHE_NEW_CLIP_PROG (1 << BRW_CACHE_CLIP_PROG)
Would it be useful to go ahead and make this an enum at the same time?
(Maybe not even change the type of state.cache yet)
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
