On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sedat,
>
> On 15/11/14 12:50, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Cosmetics? Intended?
>>
>> $ LC_ALL=C git status
>> # On branch master
>> # Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
>> #
>> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>>
>> $ LC_ALL=C git checkout -b 10.4 origin/10.4
>> Branch 10.4 set up to track remote branch 10.4 from origin.
>> Switched to a new branch '10.4'
>>
>> $ LC_ALL=C git describe
>> 10.2-branchpoint-3617-ga4ffc2a
>>
> It seems that git describe does not like/honour tags that have not been
> signed. With the 10.3 and 10.4 branchpoint being such, this leads to the
> case you've pointed out.
git help describe:
--tags
Instead of using only the annotated tags, use any tag found in
refs/tags namespace. This option enables matching a lightweight
(non-annotated) tag.
Does "annotated" mean "signed"?
$ git describe HEAD
10.2-branchpoint-3007-ge1c5444
$ git describe --tags HEAD
10.3-branchpoint-937-ge1c5444
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
