On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund <kusmab...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> So when checking/building sse code we have three possibilities: >>>> 1 Old compiler, throws an error when using -msse* >>>> 2 New compiler, user disables sse* (-mno-sse*) >>>> 3 New compiler, user doesn't disable sse >>>> >>>> The original code, added code for #1 but not #2. Later on we patched >>>> around the lack of handling #2 by wrapping the code in __SSE4_1__. >>>> Yet it lead to a missing/undefined symbol in case of #1 or #2, which >>>> might cause an issue for #2 when using the i965 driver. >>>> >>>> A bit later we "fixed" the undefined symbol by using #1, rather than >>>> updating it to handle #2. With this commit we set things straight :) >>>> >>>> To top it all up, conventions state that in case of conflicting >>>> (-enable-foo -disable-foo) options, the latter one takes precedence. >>>> Thus we need to make sure to prepend -msse4.1 to CFLAGS in our test. >>>> >>>> Cc: Siavash Eliasi <siavashser...@gmail.com> >>>> Cc: Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Man this thing is _very_ messy. >>>> Matt from the last hunk it seems that pixman might need fixing. Should >>>> be bother with that, or let people have fun when they hit it :P >>>> >>>> -Emil >>>> >>>> configure.ac | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >>>> index 91e111b..9d1835e 100644 >>>> --- a/configure.ac >>>> +++ b/configure.ac >>>> @@ -252,7 +252,19 @@ AC_SUBST([VISIBILITY_CXXFLAGS]) >>>> dnl >>>> dnl Optional flags, check for compiler support >>>> dnl >>>> -AX_CHECK_COMPILE_FLAG([-msse4.1], [SSE41_SUPPORTED=1], >>>> [SSE41_SUPPORTED=0]) >>>> +save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" >>>> +CFLAGS="-msse4.1 $CFLAGS" >>>> +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[ >>>> +#include <mmintrin.h> >>>> +#include <xmmintrin.h> >>>> +#include <emmintrin.h> >>>> +#include <smmintrin.h> >>>> +int main () { >>>> + __m128i a = _mm_set1_epi32 (0), b = _mm_set1_epi32 (0), c; >>>> + c = _mm_max_epu32(a, b); >>>> + return 0; >>> >>> This seems complicated. >>> >>> (a) Just #include <immintrin.h> >>> (b) Is any of this even necessary? how about >>> >>> int main() { return !__SSE_4_1__; } >> >> Checking that you can actually using the intrinsics seens like a good >> plan. Pixman's configure.ac has been doing that for a long time. I'd >> rather copy that. It's not like we'd save much by not doing it. > > ...But then we cannot cross-compile with run-time SSE 4.1 support from > a machine without SSE 4.1 support, no?
Why not? It's a compile-time test. Obviously if there's no compiler support, then you're SOL... _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev