On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 October 2014 02:32, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 24 October 2014 01:29, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>>> I just noticed this patch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why aren't we using pkg-config? >>>>>> >>>>> Because the package (neither upstream nor distros) provide the >>>>> relevant .pc file(s) :-( >>>>> Perhaps someone can give the upstream devs a ping/send them a patch ? >>>> >>>> What version doesn't have a .pc file? libelf-0.8.13-r1 (stable) in >>>> Gentoo has libelf.pc. >>> >>> From the sources on http://www.mr511.de/software/ the first version to >>> have a .pc file was 0.8.6, which is from 2005. >> >> Ah, I see that there's an elfutils package that provides also libelf >> -- without a pkg-config file. Good grief. >> > Never heard/knew that there is another libelf provider but elfutils. > I'm not sure how things are in Gentoo but Arch and Fedora seem to use > elfutils. > Have you tested building/running mesa with the alternative libelf provider ?
Yeah, we allow either libelf or elfutils to satisfy the dependency in Gentoo. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
