https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84242
--- Comment #6 from David Kredba <nheghathivhis...@gmail.com> --- patch -p1 < ../../binutils-2.24-shared-pie.patch patching file ld/emultempl/elf32.em Hunk #1 FAILED at 1480. Hunk #2 FAILED at 1504. Hunk #3 FAILED at 1620. 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/emultempl/elf32.em.rej The next patch would create the file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start-shared.d, which already exists! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] n Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored patching file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start-userdef.d Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] patch: tty read failed: Bad file descriptor Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start-userdef.d.rej patching file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start-weak.d Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start-weak.d.rej patching file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start.d Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start.d.rej So the patch is really included in my binutils. I will try no LTO and if it fails the same way your version of binutils + your patch to binutils. In the mean time I will try find out if ld.gold can link it and if I can find out what symbol(s)/function(s) is(are) exactly reffered by that frame numbers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
