On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:29:34PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:24:40PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:56:03PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > > > On 09/09/14 16:26, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:43:55AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > >> In LLVM 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 the patch level was only set in config.h when > > > >> LLVM was built via autoconf and not when it was built with cmake. > > > >> Fall back to retrieving the patch level from llvm-config --version to > > > >> handle this case. > > > >> > > > > > > > > We should extract LLVM_VERSION_PATH from $LLVM_VERSION and then we won't > > > > have to worry about which config file it is in. > > > > > > > I believe you meant VERSION_PATCH above ? Indeed that would nice thing to > > > have > > > but I doubt that it will get back-ported to the llvm 3.4 branch. > > > > > > > I mean we should do this in Mesa's configure script. Something like: > > > > LLVM_VERSION_PATCH = echo $LLVM_VERSION | sed 's/^[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.//g' > > This should be > > LLVM_VERSION_PATCH = echo $LLVM_VERSION | sed -E 's/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.//g' > > $ echo 3.4.2 | sed 's/^[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.//g' > 3.4.2 > > $ echo 3.4.2 | sed -E 's/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.//g' > 2 > > $ echo 3.4.2 | gsed 's/^[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.//g' > 2 > > $ echo 3.4.2 | gsed -E 's/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.//g' > 2
Which of these examples are *BSD compatible? -Tom _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
